<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:28:54 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[DZone.com: PHP Yaf (Yet Another Framework) Is Very Fast]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/17164</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/17164</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In <a href="http://css.dzone.com/articles/php-yaf-yet-another-framework">this new post</a> on DZone.com today <i>John Esposito</i> talks about an interesting PHP framework that has come to light lately - the <a href="http://us.php.net/yaf">Yet Another Framework</a>, an oddly named PHP extension that provides some of the basics to build a framework-based application.
</p>
<blockquote>
Why care about another PHP framework? especially one that's actually called <a href="http://us.php.net/yaf">Yet Another Framework</a>? Because Yaf isn't just a framework. It's a PHP extension (listed on PECL), so it's written in C -- so it's very, very fast. How fast? Here's a <a href="https://github.com/eryx/labs/tree/master/php-framework-benchmark/result-20110701">benchmark</a> (requests/sec).
</blockquote>
<p>
The only framework (of the list he compared) that came in faster was <a href="http://code.google.com/p/micromvc-php/">MicroMVC</a> and that's not as full-featured as the Yaf functionality is. Disregarding that, it has a huge requests/second difference between even the next on the list, <a href="http://codeigniter.com">CodeIgniter</a>. 
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:12:54 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
