<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:32:09 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[PHPEverywhere: Is PHP4 the new perl?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4866</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4866</link>
      <description><![CDATA[From PHPEverywhere today, there's <a href="http://phplens.com/phpeverywhere/?q=node/view/226">a new post</a> from <i>John Lim</i> that asks the question, "Is PHP4 the new Perl?"
<p>
<quote>
<i>
<a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/02/17/PHP">Tim Bray</a>, one of authors of XML, voices concern about PHP: "So here's my problem, based on my limited experience with PHP (deploying a couple of free apps to do this and that, and debugging a site for a non-technical friend here and there): all the PHP code I've seen in that experience has been messy, unmaintainable crap. Spaghetti SQL wrapped in spaghetti PHP wrapped in spaghetti HTML, replicated in slightly-varying form in dozens of places.
<p>
But in the big picture, it feels vulnerable to me."
</i>
</quote>
<p>
<a href="http://phplens.com/phpeverywhere/?q=node/view/226">John argues</a> that it's not the language's fault if the code that's written is bad (more coders need <a href="http://phplens.com/phpeverywhere/node/view/86">this</a>). He also suggests that maybe PHP4 is perl for the web - simply because of the one of the reasons it's popular - it's potential for abuse from badly written code.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:23:27 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
