<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:55:36 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Alan Knowles' Blog: Licence to release PHP code?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9878</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9878</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
A little while back, <i>Alan Knowles</i> <a href="http://www.akbkhome.com/blog.php/View/159/Licence_to_release_PHP_code.html">wondered something</a> that I'm sure has crosses the mind of every PHP developer out there, especially when they came across a particularly bad chunk of code - some people should need to apply for a license before releasing their PHP code out into the wild.
</p> 
<blockquote>
Unlike most of the reviews you get, I was specifically looking at code quality [of the CMSs]. not fuzzy does it look nice!
</blockquote>
<p>
He looks at a whole list of them including: Tanslucis, Siteman, Pivot, jaf-cms, Guppy, Doop and CutePHP. Unfortunately, most of the news is bad - between badly structured code and mixes of HTML and PHP, there was almost nothing good in any of them.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:10:37 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
