<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:57:32 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Marcus Borger's Blog: PHP, Help from Companies & Licenses]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/12116</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/12116</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In <a href="http://blog.somabo.de/2009/03/php-help-from-companies-licenses.html">this new post</a> to his blog, <i>Marcus Borger</i> looks a companies and their relationship to the PHP project - more specifically <a href="http://zend.com">Zend</a> and their close ties with PHP and its source.
</p>
<blockquote>
Why can <a href="http://zend.com/">Zend</a> not simply change the license of the Zend Engine to PHP License? Why do we want this? Because it creates issues with using PHP. And we do not even inform people about it, because we are silent about this fact. So is there a reason why this has not happened already long ago?
</blockquote>
<p>
He points out the two different sides to consider - how they (Zend and their employees) have contributed to the language and its development and what the license says about ownership of the main engine. <i>Andi Gutmans</i> (of Zend) has <a href="http://blog.somabo.de/2009/03/php-help-from-companies-licenses.html?showComment=1236741480000#c7030668321738044996">made a comment</a> on the post about why the licensing is set up how it is and how it relates to the <a href="http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/TSRM/">TSRM library</a>.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:57:34 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
