<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:48:54 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Scott Johnson's Blog: The Overhead of PHP is_ functions?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5400</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5400</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Despite some apparent time as a nurse for two small furry creatures, <i>Scott Johnson</i> as found time to get back into his "geekiness" in <a href="http://fuzzyblog.com/archives/2006/05/19/a-sickly-quiet-descends-upon-the-household-and-overhead-of-php-is_-functions/">this new post</a> on his blog.
</p>
<p>
He asks the question: "Is there significant overhead to the is_ functions like is_array, is_object, is_string in php?" He wonders if those kinds of functions, since they are on such a base level, could cause more trouble than their worth when used en masse. He asks because it's used heavily in an approach for his developing Ookles application.
</p>
<p>
There's already been <a href="http://fuzzyblog.com/archives/2006/05/19/a-sickly-quiet-descends-upon-the-household-and-overhead-of-php-is_-functions/#comments">one comment</a> made on the post, and it mentions that they are, in fact, a trivial call to PHP. It's a simple test that validates simply without much need for too much background action. It does mentions some caveats - is_object, is_resource, and, at times, is_callable.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 06:04:36 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
