<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:42:33 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Dan Scott's Blog: Super-alpha MARC package for PHP: comments requested]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6033</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6033</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Dan Scott</i> has posted <a href="http://www.coffeecode.net/archives/78-Super-alpha-MARC-package-for-PHP-comments-requested.html">a request for comments</a> on his blog today concerning a Super-alpha MARC package for PHP that he's been working up. He's asking readers for their opinions of if they'd use it or not.
</p>
<blockquote>
Okay, I've been working on <a href="http://marc.coffeecode.net/">this project</a> (let's call it PEAR_MARC, although it's not an official PEAR project yet) in my spare moments over the past month or two. It's a new PHP package for working with MARC records. The package tries to follow the <a href="http://pear.php.net/">PEAR project</a> standards (coding, documentation, error handlers, etc) in the hopes that, when I put a proposal forward, it will be accepted as a true PEAR package. For now, I'm most interested in getting feedback from coders for libraries on the usability of the API that I've designed -- is it easy enough to use and does it offer the functionality that you require for your day-to-day work?
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://www.coffeecode.net/archives/78-Super-alpha-MARC-package-for-PHP-comments-requested.html">talks about</a> the development of the package (from the <a href="http://php-marc.sf.net/">php-marc</a> package) and some of the differences between the two. Among them are:
<ul>
<li>System requirements
<li>Functionality (different means to the same end)
<li>Error handling
<li>Tests (unit testing files included)
</ul>
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:08:32 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
