<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:20:05 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Matthew Weier O'Phinney's Blog: Setting up your Zend_Test test suites]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11014</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11014</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In a <A href="http://weierophinney.net/matthew/archives/190-Setting-up-your-Zend_Test-test-suites.html">new post</a> to his blog <i>Matthew Weier O'Phinney</i> talks about using the Zend_Test component of the Zend Framework to set up test suites on your application.
</p>
<blockquote>
Testing and test automation should be easy and the complex approach is overkill for most of our applications. Fortunately, PHPUnit offers some other methods that make doing so relatively simple. The easiest method is to use an <a href="http://www.phpunit.de/pocket_guide/3.2/en/appendixes.configuration.html">XML configuration file</a>.
</blockquote>
<p>
He includes a basic XML config file for a "My Test Suite" setup defining the application's directory and where to log the end report to. This simple PHPUnit configuration can be used with the "phpunit" command line binary to auto-configure all you'll need for the testing. <i>Matthew</i> also includes the code for a sample TestHelper you can drop right into the app to help set up your environment correctly when testing is needed.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:58:11 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[ThinkPHP Blog:  PHProjekt Version 5.2 now available]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6955</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6955</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
As per <a href="http://blog.thinkphp.de/archives/177-PHProjekt-Version-5.2-now-available.html">this post</a> to the ThinkPHP Blog, the latest version of PHPProjekt (5.2) has been made available.
</p>
<blockquote>
Mayflower announces that Version 5.2 of its free popular open source groupware suite "PHProjekt" is available immediately and ready for download.
</blockquote>
<p>
Updates in <a href="http://blog.thinkphp.de/archives/www.phprojekt.com">the new version</a> include a refactored user interface, Dojo integration, porting it over to the IBM DB2 database system, an update to the Helpdesk, and automatic email functionality.
</p>
<p>
Get full information on the PHPProjekt from <a href="http://blog.thinkphp.de/archives/www.phprojekt.com">www.phpprojekt.com</a>.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:55:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[ImprovedSource.com: PHP v5.2 vs PHP v5.1]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6703</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6703</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
As part of a project he was working up, <i>Cory Rauch</i> has created <a href="http://www.improvedsource.com/view.php/Web-Performance/11/">some statistics</a> comparing the performance of the latest PHP 5 series release, PHP 5.2, with the previous version, PHP 5.1.
</p>
<p>
I can't say the results of the benchmarks are surprising, but it does give a good idea of where, speed-wise, they really improved things in this new release. There are some stats, though, that didn't make that much of a jump. Those seem to be ones dealing with objects and their handling, though - so there's not that much of a jump there anyway.
</p>
<p>
He <a href="http://www.improvedsource.com/view.php/Web-Performance/11/">tested all sorts of operations</a>, including working with binary data, string and array functionality, looping (for, foreach, etc), and operators. For each statistic, he provides what the test is doing and what the results are. Testing was done with the <a href="http://phplens.com/benchmark_suite/">PHPLens</a> benchmark suite.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:14:36 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sebastian Bergmann's Blog: Who Uses PHPUnit?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6235</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6235</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Sebastian Bergmann</i> asks a <a href="http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/blog/archives/623-Who-Uses-PHPUnit.html">simple question</a> in his latest post - "who uses PHPUnit?"
</p>
<blockquote>
I am putting together a list of projects that use PHPUnit. The purpose of this list is not only to show who uses PHPUnit but also to provide a list of example test suites that are built using PHPUnit.
</blockquote>
<p>
More specifically, he's looking for projects that use <a href="http://www.phpunit.de">PHPUnit</a> that isn't listed <a href="http://www.phpunit.de/wiki/WhoUsesPHPUnit">on this page</a>. If you have a project or know of one that's using this popular unit testing suite, <a href="http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/blog/archives/623-Who-Uses-PHPUnit.html">post a comment here</a> to let him know.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:53:41 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sjon.Blog:  Protecting your property (PHP Encryption)]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4584</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4584</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There's always been several PHP developers out there looking to protect the source that they so lovingly crafted. They look for alternatives to keeping it safe, but sometimes it's just not enough. In <a href="http://sjon.hortensius.net/blog/2005/12/protecting-your-property">this new post</a> on the Sjon.Blog today, he mentions some of the frustrations he's had already with exectly this.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
Zend almost convinced me that their <a href="http://www.zend.com/store/products/zend-safeguard-suite.php">Safeguard Suite</a> really secured your PHP scripts. Ofcourse I know that scripts need to be interpreted and executed and are therefore never 100% safe; but I expected some form of obfuscation and rewriting to prevent this. This <a href="http://www.phpdecode.com/">doesn't seem</a> to be the case though. I have had a look at <a href="http://pobs.mywalhalla.net/">PHP Obfuscator/Obscurer</a>, but a good illustration of the quality of that script can be illustrated with a simple, readable example.
<p>
Also, obfuscating <a href="http://www.react.nl/">React</a> took me almost an hour; which isn't that strange when you have had a look at the sourcecode. 
</i>
</quote>
<p>
As far as I've heard/seen so far, there's not really a good solution to <a href="http://sjon.hortensius.net/blog/2005/12/protecting-your-property">this dilema</a>. Sure, some are better than others, but there's still a hole there that is just waiting to be filled with an application anyone can use...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 07:15:19 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
