<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:28:28 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Chris Hartjes' Blog: CakePHP Mythbusters!]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11668</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11668</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In an effort to dispel some of the rumors and myths around the CakePHP framework (as presented most recently by <a href="http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/web/PhpFrameworksComparingCakePhpAndSymfony">a different blogger</a>) <i>Chris Hartjes</i> has <a href="http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2009/01/04/cakephp-mythbusters/">made a new "mythbuster" post</a> to his blog today with a rebuttal to the points from the other article.
</p>
<blockquote>
I ran across an article comparing CakePHP and Symfony and found that the writer had a number of preconceived ideas about CakePHP. These same ideas keep popping up everywhere, used by people looking to get their hate on about CakePHP. I sent a very well-reasoned email to the writer clearing up some of those misconceptions [...] So, in the interest of clarifying things about CakePHP I thought I would share that email, slightly rewritten for this blog posting, but the content is roughly the same. 
</blockquote>
<p>
The <a href="http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2009/01/04/cakephp-mythbusters/">post/email</a> covers a few different topics some might have misconceptions about concerning the framework:
</p>
<ul>
<li>Lack of Documentation
<li>Scaffolding
<li>Models are tied to controllers in a 1:1 relationship
<li>Cake's Ajax and Javascript helpers do not support graceful degradation
<li>Cake's HTML and Form helpers produces bad markup
<li>Unit tests are an afterthought
<li>CakePHP is not an "enterprise capable framework"
</ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:47:16 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
