<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:26:46 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Freek Lijten's Blog: Currently on PHP's internals...]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/16476</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/16476</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Freek Lijten</i> has a recent post looking at some of the <a href="http://www.freeklijten.nl/home/2011/06/10/Currently-on-PHPs-internals...">types of discussions that happen</a> on the php-internals mailing list.
</p>
<blockquote>
The internals list is the place to be to hear about the current state of PHP. It is one of PHP's many mailing lists, but this is the one where (core) developers discuss new features, current bugs and wild ideas. If you want to keep up with things it is a good idea to sign up, it is not an extremely high volume list and if you ignore the noise it is quite informative. In this article I would like to share examples of stuff typically discussed on the list.
</blockquote>
<p>
He mentions feature requests in general and, more specifically things like traits support (multiple inheritance), array dereferencing, callable arrays and the debate over the short array syntax.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:57:16 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Mike Willbanks' Blog: PHP Type Hinting]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/12832</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/12832</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
There's been lots of talk about type hinting lately (both on <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/12819">blogs</a> and on mailing lists) so <i>Mike Willbanks</i> has decided to add <a href="http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2009/07/07/php-type-hinting/">some of his own thoughts</a> about why it should be included.
</p>
<blockquote>
You may be wondering why you would want type hinting in a dynamic language. This can come in very handy especially if you are looking to enforce a specific type or need to ensure that you are indeed working with say an integer. Since this is written in C, it will be far faster than actually type casting it yourself or enforcing it yourself. General speed improvements are always nice to have.
</blockquote>
<p>
He includes two code examples of it in use and points to the <a href="http://news.php.net/php.internals">php.internals</a> mailing list for the vote count either way. So far (as of the time of those post) the results seem mixed with some recommending it outright while others suggest waiting until the spec is completely done before integration (PHP6?).
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:57:11 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[SitePoint PHP Blog: Keeping current with PHP]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10615</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10615</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Today on the SitePoint PHP blog <i>Troels Knak-Nielsen</i> <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/07/16/keeping-current-with-php/">reminds the community</a> about a "one-stop resource" that they can use to keep up to date on some of the latest happenings with the PHP language, the <a href="http://wiki.php.net">PHP.net wiki</a>.
</p>
<blockquote>
Since March, there has been a wiki at wiki.php.net. The most interesting section is probably <a href="http://wiki.php.net/rfc">wiki.php.net/rfc</a>, which - as the name implies - contains <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments">RFC</a>'s for improvements of the language. <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/12/23/lexical-scope-to-appear-in-php/">I've rambled on about closures and lambdas</a> before, but as you can see, there is now an accepted patch. Whether it'll make it into 5.3 is unlikely at this point, but it looks like it'll at least be coming with 5.4 and/or 6.0.
</blockquote>
<p>
He also points out the <a href="http://news.php.net/php.internals">php-internals mailing list</a> and the <a href="http://devzone.zend.com/tag/Weekly_Summaries">summaries</a> that <i>Steph Fox</i> has written up weekly about the list's latest conversations.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:47:34 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Padraic Brady's Blog: Namespaces (or Yet Another Pointless Opinion Piece)]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9247</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9247</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Adding even more to the huge namespaces debates going on, <i>Padraic Brady</i> has <a href="http://blog.astrumfutura.com/archives/326-Namespaces-or-Yet-Another-Pointless-Opinion-Piece.html">some of his opinions</a> posted to his blog on the subject.
</p>
<blockquote>
The problem isn't that namespaces are bad, it's that these arcane structures seem to have so little impact on development in PHP today for many many people. Does that mean it's unimportant?
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://blog.astrumfutura.com/archives/326-Namespaces-or-Yet-Another-Pointless-Opinion-Piece.html">talks about</a> the real value of namespaces, a comparison to type hinting's inclusion, the current amount of (needless?) traffic on the php.internals list and his opinions on why namespaces are valid.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:01:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jeremy Privett's Blog:  Is PHP Doomed?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7873</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7873</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In a <a href="http://php.jeremyprivett.com/archives/is-php-doomed/">new entry on his blog</a> today, <i>Jeremy Privett</i> shares some of his thoughts and asks the question that's crossed more than a few developers' minds out there - "is PHP doomed?"
</p>
<blockquote>
As an outsider looking in, and being a realist instead of a fanboy, I'm finding it extremely hard to believe that PHP is going to continue its much hyped and proclaimed success in its current circumstances.
</blockquote>
<p>
From <a href="http://php.jeremyprivett.com/archives/is-php-doomed/">his point of view</a> there's a few things that, if the web was exposed to (like "tiffs that occur on PHP Internals") PHP's popularity would fade quite a bit.
</p>
<blockquote>
As much as I hate to say this...You guys really need to take some advice from Ruby Devs. I've been watching the Dev List over there and following it as well, and I don't see even half of the virtual crap-flinging that's almost become an everyday occurrence on the PHP Internals list.
</blockquote>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:14:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

