<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:36 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Larry Garfield's Blog: Where are the PHP 4 developers?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9395</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9395</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
As mentioned by <a href="http://www.phpguru.org/#174">Richard Heyes</a>, there's a <a href="http://www.garfieldtech.com/blog/where-php4">new blog post</a> from <i>Larry Garfield</i> talking about the death of PHP4, how the community has responded to it and some of his own thoughts on the matter.
</p>
<blockquote>
The problem is the source for that "everyone" [is still using PHP4] claim. The most widely referenced stats are the <a href="http://www.nexen.net/chiffres_cles/phpversion/17875-php_stats_evolution_for_november_2007.php">Nexen stats</a>, and according to them 70%+ of the world still uses PHP 4. Horrors!
</blockquote>
<p>
He takes a closer look at the stats and comes up with a slightly different sort of conclusion that the stats can't really measure. They can show the server-based usage measurements of PHP4 vs PHP5, but they can't show the number of developers behind each of them.
</p>
<p>According to <i>Larry</i>:</p>
<blockquote>
Even if we assume that 70% of PHP developers are using 70% of random servers running PHP, and that they're all using proprietary, one-off applications on a server with a sysadmin who refuses to upgrade at a company that has no support contract with any distribution vendor... Where are they?
</blockquote>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:54:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
