<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:14:42 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Joshua Eichorn's Blog: New code in PEAR2]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10382</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10382</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Joshua Eichorn</i> has <a href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/archives/2008/06/09/new-code-in-pear2/">blogged about</a> three new projects he's added to the PEAR2 repository:
</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://svn.pear.php.net/wsvn/PEARSVN/sandbox/Console_CommandLine/?rev=0&sc=0">COnsole_CommandLine</a> - a port of the PEAR1 console package
<li><a href="http://svn.pear.php.net/wsvn/PEARSVN/sandbox/Template_Dwoo/?rev=0&sc=0">Template_Dwoo</a> - a Smarty-compatible template engine
<li><a href="http://svn.pear.php.net/wsvn/PEARSVN/sandbox/template_engine/?rev=0&sc=0">template_engine</a> - a simple templating engine (and the example package for namespace usage)
</ul>
<blockquote>
Not really what I expected to be the first round of new code, but its nice to be setting up access for people. Oh and remember PEAR2 is targeted at php 5.3 but not everything is namespaced yet since not everyone wants to run snapshots of php for development.
</blockquote>
<p>
You can find more of the packages on the <a href="http://svn.pear.php.net/wsvn/PEARSVN">PEAR2 svn repository</a>.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:49:20 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Lukas Smith's Blog: Little status update]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6506</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6506</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Along with a few personal comments, <i>Lukas Smith</i> has <a href="http://pooteeweet.org/blog/492">posted some thoughts</a> about the state of everything PEAR following his stepping down from working as an active developer on the project.
</p>
<blockquote>
I guess with me and Pierre leaving it did spawn a lot of energy about how to organize PEAR in the future. I am still participating in this discussion to some extent, mainly functioning as the historian who can explain why things are the way they are etc in order to prevent people from making rash decisions or even worse repeating old mistakes.
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://pooteeweet.org/blog/492">also comments</a> on the state of package submissions to PEAR, noting that some of them are just unrealistic and that it might be better to start a "PEAR2" side to allow for some of these more expanded ideas to flourish. 
</p>
<blockquote>
Instead I think each of the categories should manage itself more. So packages approval would be handled within the category. The same for QA'ing etc. This way new developers would not be facing this gigantic community. I think this is simply overwhelming. Even for old developers it becomes impossible to feel "at home" in a project of the size of PEAR.
</blockquote>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
