<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:47:44 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Vance Lucas' Blog: NoSQL First Impressions: Object Databases Missed the Boat]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/14428</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/14428</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In a new post to his blog today <i>Vance Lucas</i> has <a href="http://www.vancelucas.com/blog/nosql-first-impressions-object-databases-missed-the-boat">shared some of his thoughts</a> on one of the hot topics in software development these days - the NoSQL movement in databases.
</p>
<blockquote>
I've spent the past few weeks here at work researching and playing with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL">NoSQL</a> databases (and especially <a href="http://mongodb.org/">MongoDB</a>) for a new feature we're developing that doesn't easily fit into a relational model. And so far, I really like what I see.
</blockquote>
<p>
He also mentions that object databases, unlike their true NoSQL cousins, "missed the boat" and haven't caught on quite as well. The reason he suggests? Their language-specificity hinders them from being more widely adopted than a cross-platform, cross-language tool. NoSQL databases are here to stay and are already finding their way into major applications all over the web and represent a strong alternative to the typical relational database storage methods.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:15:13 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
