<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:07:11 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Ben Ramsey's Blog: Lampooning Benchmarks]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8742</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8742</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In response to <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/8725">this previous post</a>, <i>Ben Ramsey</i> has <a href="http://benramsey.com/archives/lampooning-benchmarks/">relayed some of this thoughts</a> on the benchmarks that were done by <i>Jonathan Street</i> comparing functions and their aliases:
</p>
<blockquote>
Mmy first reaction was something like: "Egads! These benchmarks are stupid and misleading! These functions are simply aliases of each other. There should be no discernible difference, and any buffoon should realize this fallacy!" This was before I clicked through from PHPDeveloper.org to read his post.
</blockquote>
<p>
After reading his data and going on to the <a href="http://torrentialwebdev.com/blog/archives/118-Better-Benchmarks.html">Better Benchmarks</a> post that followed it, he found that most of the results of additional testing came out negligible and that there was almost no difference between the two. 
</p>
<p>
<i>Ben</i> illustrates the proof of this with a few lines pasted from the "ext/standard/basic_functions.c" in PHP's source showing that the code is shared via a PHP_FALIAS function call.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:42:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
