<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:22:41 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[PHP Kitchen: Seagull Gets Top Marks in Recent Framework Comparison]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5025</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5025</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://phpkitchen.com/index.php?/archives/744-Seagull-Gets-Top-Marks-in-Recent-Framework-Comparison.html">a new post</a> on PHPKitchen.com, <i>Demian Turner</i> notes that the framework he's a developer on, <a href="http://seagull.phpkitchen.com/">Seagull</a>, recieved high marks in a recent <a href="http://www.phpit.net/article/ten-different-php-frameworks/">comparison of 10 PHP frameworks</a>.
<p>
<quote>
<i>
Thanks to Daniel Pallet over at <a href="http://www.phpit.net/">http://www.phpit.net/</a> for his recent article <a href="http://www.phpit.net/article/ten-different-php-frameworks/">comparing 10 PHP frameworks</a>. It's a pleasant surprise that based on the checkmarks for features marking scheme, <a href="http://seagull.phpkitchen.com/">Seagull</a> came out with the top score. A lot of complaints from the other contestants "you didn't give me credit for this" - I guess visibility of features is an important feature in itself.
</i>
</quote>
<p>
There's <a href="http://phpkitchen.com/index.php?/archives/744-Seagull-Gets-Top-Marks-in-Recent-Framework-Comparison.html">also mention</a> of the renewed effort to bring the documentation and tutorials offered for the framework up to date with the latest stable release - version 0.6.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:19:55 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
