<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:14:46 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[P&aacute;draic Brady's Blog: Template Lite: A Sweeter Smarty Alternative]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6318</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6318</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In his <a href="http://blog.quantum-star.com/index.php?/archives/232-Template-Lite-A-Sweeter-Smarty-Alternative.html">latest blog post</a>, <i>P&aacute;draic Brady</i> talks about a "sweeter alternative" to using Smarty for your site's templating - <a href="http://templatelite.sourceforge.net/">Template Lite</a>.
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
Use the term Template Engine in a PHP forum and the word "Smarty" will inevitably crop up. I like Smarty but, similar to a few PHP libraries, it's very bloated.
</p>
<p>
I try to keep my applications lean and mean - small, fast, and adaptable. Unfortunately, Smarty disagrees with my needs. It's bloated design while packing a mighty punch, uses a chunk of memory and processor time I dislike. Since I also develop open source apps which end up on shared hosts, my concerns are even more justified.
</p>
<p>
Enter Mark Dickenson. Mark is the developer of a <a href="http://smarty.php.net">Smarty</a> alternative: <a href="http://templatelite.sourceforge.net/">Template Lite</a>.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://blog.quantum-star.com/index.php?/archives/232-Template-Lite-A-Sweeter-Smarty-Alternative.html">talks about</a> what Template Lite is and what kinds of advantages it has over Smarty, including staying try to its name. <i>P&aacute;draic</i> measures it as not only being faster but also having 50% of the memoery footprint that Smarty does. He seems to favor it for those places when he just needs something light and easy on a site.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:53:02 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Marcus Whitney's Blog: Mobile Apps In A Hurry - Flash Lite to PHP?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4795</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/4795</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In one of his latest posts, <i>Marcus Whitney</i> <a href="http://www.marcuswhitney.com/?p=43">looks at</a> the upcoming year and what the future holds for mobile applications - and where PHP might fit into it (with a little help from Flash Lite).
<p>
<quote>
<i>
Since meeting <a href="http://jaxn.org/blog/archives/1503-lunch-with-marcus.html">with Jackson for lunch this week</a>, I am definitely convnced that he is on to something when he says <a href="http://jaxn.org/blog/archives/1452-mobile-homes.html">2006 is going to be huge for mobile</a>. Here's another challenge to the PHP community. <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/mobile/">Flash Lite</a> is pretty cool. So.. I'm pretty excited by Flash Lite, and the announcement that Samsung phones will support it is good news for me and all the Sprint/Nextel/Embarq customers out there. 
<p>
Any chance us PHP devs will be able to start writing robust mobile apps? Maybe working in tandem wiith the beauty of Flash on the front end?
</i>
</quote>
<p>
It'd be interesting to <a href="http://www.marcuswhitney.com/?p=43">see if this line of thought</a> would lead to any major PHP/Flash applications. The possibility is definitely there with its ability to not only import data like XML, but pull in other resources as well...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:02:40 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
