<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:03:05 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[SitePoint Web Tech Blog: Roll Your Own Twitter Clone]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/12378</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/12378</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
On the SitePoint Web Tech blog <i>Raena Jackson-Armitage</i> has <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/04/14/roll-your-own-twitter-clone/">a recent post</a> on a few tools that you can use to mimic some of the functionality Twitter offers (three of them) with applications that already exist.
</p>
<blockquote>
If you're anything like me, you've already wondered how easy it would be to make your own'"perhaps you'd like to set up a microblog for you and your colleagues to share links and have discussions. [...] Today we'll look at three new solutions that are easy to set up, have reasonably modest hosting requirements, and even include some features that blow Twitter out of the water. 
</blockquote>
<p>They suggest three tools:</p>
<ul>
<li>the <a href="http://en.blog.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/p2-the-new-prologue/">P2 plugin</a> for <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a>
<li>the <a href="http://movabletype.org/motion">Motion</a> plugin for <a href="http://movabletype.com/">Movable Type</a>
<li><a href="http://laconi.ca/">Laconica</a> (the platform that <a href="http://identi.ca/">Identica</a> runs on, a full Twitter clone with other added features)
</ul>
<p>
Each of these comes with a description of installation, features offered and use.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:31:19 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Paul Jones' Blog: Rasmus Lerdorf's Laconic(a) Performance]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10972</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10972</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Paul Jones</i> has <a href="http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=330">taken a look</a> at some performance statistics that <i>Rasmus Lerdorf</i> shared in a <a href="http://talks.php.net/show/froscon08">recent presentation</a> from some of his tests.
</p>
<blockquote>
It was with some interest, then, that I viewed Rasmus Lerdorf's <a href="http://talks.php.net/show/froscon08">slides</a> on the subject of performance benchmarking. I'm beginning to think there's something unexpected or unexamined in his testing methodology.
</blockquote>
<p>
<i>Paul</i> compares some of his statistics (gathered from <a href="http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315">his testing</a>) to those of <i>Rasmus</i> and finds a few places where things don't quite match up - specifically in the default overhead that seems to be a part of <i>Rasmus'</i> stats. <i>Paul</i> goes on to look at EC2 as a cause to the problems but ends up without much of a confirmed answer.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:19:55 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
