<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:31:18 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jani Hartikainen's Blog: Base classes in OOP programming languages]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11429</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11429</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Jani Hartikainen</i> has followed up on a post from <i>David Otten</i> about standard classes in PHP and how they provide the base for much of what the language does.
</p>
<blockquote>
David Otton posted a <A href="http://www.otton.org/2008/11/11/php-base-class-stdclass/">short but thought-provoking post about stdClass</a>, which many think is the "base class" all PHP classes automatically inherit from. I have to admit that I had this misconception as well. [...] This [difference in PHP from other OOP languages] presents some room for analysis in how things are handled in dynamic and static languages, and how those differences affect things...
</blockquote>
<p>
<i>Jani</i> <a href="http://codeutopia.net/blog/2008/11/19/base-classes-in-oop-programming-languages/">talks about</a> dynamic and static typing in languages and how that effects the base types things are extended from as well as some of the benefits that having a standard base class affords developers.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:10:58 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
