<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:36:34 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Nelm.io Blog: Composer: Part 2 - Impact]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/17283</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/17283</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In part two of their look at Composer/Packagist, the Nelm.io blog looks at <a href="http://nelm.io/blog/2011/12/composer-part-2-impact/">some of the impact they could have</a> if adopted heavily by the PHP community.
</p>
<blockquote>
In this second part I would like to talk about a few things Composer could do for you, and the PHP community at large, once it is broadly adopted. [...] How can [shared] interfaces be distributed in each project that uses or implements them? This is where I see Composer helping. Composer supports advanced relationships between packages, so to solve this issue you would need three parts.
</blockquote>
<p>
The three parts all revolve around a few different packages (for their specific Caching interface example) - psr/cache-interface, psr/cache and the requiring of these into a framework needing the common interface. He talks some about what this sort of structure has to offer: simpler plugin installation, promotion of good standards, promotion of code reuse and a renewed interest in using PHP.
</p>
<blockquote>
Reinventing the package management wheel is another thing that really should stop. Who am I to say this you ask? It is true, we are building a shiny new wheel as well. Yet I take comfort in the fact that we are trying to build a generic solution which will work for everybody.
</blockquote>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:02:53 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[php|architect: Impact Award Winners (for php|tek '11)]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/16417</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/16417</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
As a part of this year's <a href="http://tek11.phparch.com">php|tek conference</a>, the folks at php|architect once again put together their choices for the "Impact Awards", a special recognition for projects that have really made a mark over the last year in a few different categories.
</p>
<blockquote>
As part of the grand finale of <a href="http://http//tek11.phparch.com">php|tek '11</a>, Keith Casey announced the winners of the first annual <a href="http://www.phparch.com/impact-awards/">php|architect Impact Awards</a>. These awards are selected by the subscribers of php|architect magazine. They represent the projects that have had the most impact on the day-to-day lives of PHP developers. php|architect is proud to announce the winners of this year's Impact Awards.
</blockquote>
<p>
Winners this year included the Frapi (in Up & Coming), MySQL (in Data Management), Xdebug (in Integration/Development) and the Best Overall Product winner - the Zend Framework.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:46 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Community News: Responses to the PHP 5.3 Alpha 1 Release]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10753</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10753</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
With the <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10735">recent release</a> of the first alpha of PHP 5.3, the community has been talking and testing this new version - here's just a few:
</p>
<ul>
<li><i>Johannes Schluter</i> <a href="http://schlueters.de/blog/archives/78-PHP-5.3-reached-its-first-major-milestone.html">looking at</a> the actual release
<li>The PHP 10.0 blog <a href="http://php100.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/php53/">mentioning the impact</a> this new release will have on the language and the web
<li>and <a href="http://usrportage.de/archives/899-Testing-PHP-5.3-alpha1.html">a few tests</a> that <i>Lars Strojny</i> has already run on the release.
<li><i>Evert Pot</i>'s <a href="http://www.rooftopsolutions.nl/article/199">look at</a> some of the upcoming features of PHP 5.3 (including code)
<li><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/phpfreaks/~3/356851538/testing-php530">Some testing</a> from PHP Freaks
<li>A <a href="http://www.stubbles.org/archives/50-Speed,-speed,-speed!.html">note about</a> some testing with the Stubbles framework
</ul>
<p>
You can check out <a href="http://wiki.php.net/todo/php53">this page</a> on the PHP.net wiki for more information on what's left for the final release and a tentative schedule for the releases in between.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:21:34 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Tony Bibbs' Blog: Microsoft and PHP]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9560</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9560</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Tony Bibbs</i>, in the wake of last week's surprise from Microsoft to Yahoo, has <a href="http://www.tonybibbs.com/article.php/MicrosoftAndPHP">posted a few of his thoughts</a> on the matter.
</p>
<blockquote>
I woke up this morning to the news of a $44 billion buy-out offer from Microsoft for Yahoo!. This is being covered from all angles in various tech sites like Slashdot but I think the one angle I haven't seen yet is what does this mean for PHP?
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://www.tonybibbs.com/article.php/MicrosoftAndPHP">mentions</a> the work that Microsoft and Zend have done to push PHP support on the OS (check out <a href="http://www.tonybibbs.com/staticpages/index.php/EmailFromMicrosoftonPHPandGL">this email</a> too) and he wonders what the final impact of it all could mean for the language - will things change drastically if Microsoft becomes a major player in the PHP world or would they stay behind the scenes and give the community the support it might need.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:16:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

