<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:54:23 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sean Coates' Blog: Actually Solving a Problem (believe it or not)]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9200</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/9200</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Sean Coates</i> has <a href="http://blog.phpdoc.info/archives/86-Actually-Solving-a-Problem-believe-it-or-not.html">posted a new item</a> on his blog today applauding <i>Greg Beaver</i> for comments made on the <a href="http://news.php.net/php.internals">php.internals</a> mailing list concerning the ongoing namespace deliberations.
</p>
<blockquote>
In a time where <a href="http://news.php.net/php.internals">php.internals</a> is becoming more and more useless due to an increasingly poor signal to noise ratio, Greg has stepped up and intelligently <a href="http://news.php.net/php.internals/33816">addressed the ongoing namespace debate</a> in a way that not only shows that he's done his homework, but delivers a much needed stomp onto the toes of many of the other posters, who, quite frankly, are talking out of their a$$es.
</blockquote>
<p>
<i>Greg</i> has <a href="http://news.php.net/php.internals/338">summarized things</a> in a six point list of recommendations for the implementation of namespaces for the language (including some dangers of their potential use).
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:24:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
