<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:59:22 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Zend Developer Zone: PHP vs. X programming language]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7003</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7003</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Getting a bit tired of those out there talking bad about PHP and comparing it to other languages, <i>Kevin Schroeder</i> decided to gather all of their complaints in one place and address them one by one.
</p>
<blockquote>
Being a new Zender I've spent some time in the recent past looking at people's opinions about PHP now that it directly affects the work I do.  In my research I have found a lot of interesting "opinions" about PHP vs. this that and the other thing, usually in the form of lists.  "4 reasons why Java will outlast PHP", for example.
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://devzone.zend.com/node/view/id/1408">lists five different things</a> (like lacking features, slowness, and no serious applications written in it) and debunks each of them with facts, eliminating the FUD that has gathered around the topic.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 07:35:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wez Furlong's Blog: PDO FUD; less anecdotes, more facts]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6132</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6132</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In <a href="http://netevil.org/node.php?nid=902">his latest post</a>, <i>Wez Furlong</i> responds to some of <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6130">Jacob Santos' comments</a> made earlier today about Service Data Objects (SDO).
</p>
<blockquote>
I was just skimming over <a href="http://www.santosj.name/php/why-sdo-doesnt-take-off/">Santos' Post about SDO</a>, and was saddened to see more anecdotes and less facts.
</blockquote>
<p>
Specifically, he <a href="http://netevil.org/node.php?nid=902">mentions two points</a> - one dealing with the definition <i>Jacob</i> gave for the functionality and the other pointing out some <a href="http://netevil.org/node.php?uuid=444a6017-0548-2459-2943-44a601714d58">better stats</a> that <i>Jscob</i> didn't include in his comments.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:14:35 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wez Furlong's Blog: Just the facts, ma'am]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5292</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5292</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Wez Furlong</i> <a href="http://netevil.org/node.php?nid=818">posts today</a> about a response made to a previous mention of "PHP vs. ASP.NET" in <a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/hull_asp.html">this article</a> from <i>Joe Stagner</i> in <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/joestagner/archive/2006/05/01/587567.aspx">this post</a> on his MSDN blog.
</p>
<p>
From <a href="http://netevil.org/node.php?nid=818">Wez</a>:
</p>
<quote>
<i>
<p>
Joe's response is perhaps a little pro-Microsoft (you can't really blame him for that--he does work there :-) but the essence of his response rings true; there's nowhere near enough factual data in the OTN article to make a balanced decision one way or the other.
</p>
<p>
To be fair to Sean (the author of the OTN article), it does say "Opinion" across the top of the page and the byline is "One developer's view of the pros and cons of the two most popular means of building web applications", but it's easy to forget those once you're into the article.
</p>
</i>
</quote>
<p>
<i>Wez</i> also <a href="http://netevil.org/node.php?nid=818">mentions</a> one of his personal views on the whole debate, basically saying that even if PHP is the faster/more efficient, some situations might do better with an ASP.NET solution (what's the cost of implementation?).
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 06:51:39 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
