<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:38:16 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Tobias Schlitt's Blog: Being "brainbench certified" ;)]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5850</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5850</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Tobias Schlitt</i> <a href="http://schlitt.info/applications/blog/index.php?/archives/483-Being-brainbench-certified-;.html">has responded</a> to our <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5848">own post</a> talking about the PHP5 "certification" that Brainbench is offering.
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
<a href="http://blog.wolff-hamburg.de/archives/6-Brainbench-PHP5-Certification.html">As Markus did</a>, I took the so-called "<a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5848">Brainbench PHP 5 certification</a>" yesterday night after some beers. ;) Nevertheless, the result was, that was I still "scored higher than 90% of previous examinees".
</p>
<p>
I have pretty much the same feeling about this exam that Markus has. I don't really see a point in testing how familiar people are with the docs, but that seems to be the main purpose of the exam. 
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://schlitt.info/applications/blog/index.php?/archives/483-Being-brainbench-certified-;.html">also notes</a> that even the examples with code weren't written well, being either too long or using deprecated functions to accomplish the taks.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:58:32 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
