<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:47:19 -0600</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Lukas Smith's Blog: emPHPower FAQ]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10698</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10698</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Lukas Smith</i> has <a href="http://pooteeweet.org/blog/0/1252">written up the FAQ</a> for the emPHPower movement and has posted about them on his blog:
</p>
<blockquote>
Well unfortunately due to timing issues the emPHPower BoF at OSCON fell through. So it goes. In preparation for the BoF I have however taken the time to write down an <a href="http://wiki.pooteeweet.org/emPHPower/FaQ">FAQ</a>. So the submission of the OSCON BoF was at least a kick in the butt for me to get this done. Please have a look and let me know if anything is unclear or unanswered.
</blockquote>
<p>
<a href="http://wiki.pooteeweet.org/emPHPower/FaQ">The FAQ</a> includes answers to lots of questions including:
</p>
<ul>
<li>How to I get involved?
<li>What is the target audience?
<li>Will emPHPower compete with existing community efforts?
<li>What is the purpose of the membership fees?
<li>Why should companies not be allowed to sponsor emPHPower directly?
<li>Who decides on what emPHPower does?
</ul>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:48:29 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Aaron Wormus' Blog:  Rewriting your Platform]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6783</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/6783</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
Sometimes developers just don't think about how much trouble they'd cause with a rewrite of existing software. They think that moving up to the latest and greatest is the way to go, and that it makes perfect sense to say out with the old and in with the new. <i>Aaron Wormus</i> <a href="http://www.wormus.com/aaron/stories/2006/11/27/rewriting-your-platform.html">disagrees</a>. Well, sometimes - it depends on the circumstances, really.
</p>
<blockquote>
At ZendCon I talked about "Planning a PHP 4 to PHP 5 codebase rewrite, a practical approach". The talk was based on my own experience, as well as famous discussion of the topic such as Joel Spolsky's "<a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html">Things you should never do</a>" and the examination of "famous" platform rewrites.
</blockquote>
<p>
<i>Aaron</i> <a href="http://www.wormus.com/aaron/stories/2006/11/27/rewriting-your-platform.html">gives an example</a> of a large company making a move from a COBOL system out to C for a mission critical system. Based on his tale, they didn't put the thought needed into making this move - new development time, keeping old developers on staff, etc - besides the fact that customers don't like change and making a move to another platform is almost definitely going to be noticed by them.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
