<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:09:07 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Travis Swicegood's Blog:  With friends like these... (or a PEAR Contribution Story)]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7797</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/7797</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
So, what happens if you try to contribute back to the community, specifically the PEAR project, and you get shot down for a proposal - even a simple one? <i>Travis Swicegood</i> <a href="http://www.travisswicegood.com/index.php/2007/05/03/with_friends_like_these">found out</a>:
</p>
<blockquote>
Yesterday I proposed my first PEAR package. I've helped a few friends with packages of their own, but never got around to getting a developer account and taking the lead on a package. After hearing about the recent changes in store and the umpteenth "you should propose that" from <a href="http://blog.joshuaeichorn.com/">Josh</a>, I decided to propose one of the smaller "packages" I've used in some of my code: <a href="http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=482">PHP_Callback</a>. I say packages with quotation marks because it's really just one, simple file.
</blockquote>
<p>
The problem wasn't in the proposal, but in the immediate responses he received for it - "it's useless", "this isn't the correct way to do this" and "it's too easy to implement on its own, it doesn't need to be in the library". 
</p>
<p>
Travis' <a href="http://www.travisswicegood.com/index.php/2007/05/03/with_friends_like_these">response</a> was to be expected:
<blockquote>
One most new-to-PHP programmers could have put together in an afternoon. I can only imagine how quickly a new developer would have unsubscribed from pear-dev and pulled his proposal if his first foray into contributing to the community had been met so quickly with such unconstructive criticism.
</blockquote>
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 09:31:00 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
