<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:32:56 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[PHP in Action: How harmful is "harmful"?]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11640</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11640</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In reference to some comments made on the <a href="http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/11622">previous post</a> ("Comments Considered Harmful") to the PHP in Action blog, there's a <a href="http://www.reiersol.com/blog/1_php_in_action/archive/175_how_harmful_is_harmful.html">new post</a> explaining and responding to some of the things said by visitors.
</p>
<blockquote>
Conflict is not a bad thing. That is, if it leads eventually towards clarity and understanding rather than confusion and misunderstanding.  [...] A debate about a technical matter may be conducted in parallel with an altercation that addresses the relationship between the participants. This is confusing in itself. Keeping these discussion apart will help maintain clarity. 
</blockquote>
<p>
Using this tact, he responds to the criticism made on the previous post, specifically one that points to <a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html">this article</a> as to why "considered harmful" articles should only be seen as fodder for argument and should be "considered harmful" themselves. 
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:22:47 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
