<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:19:35 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Michael Kimsal's Blog: Magento book review found]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10393</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10393</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In response to <a href="http://www.htmlist.com/development/book-review-phparchitects-guide-to-programming-magento/">another blogger's review</a> of the php|architect "Guide to Programming with Magento", <i>Michael Kimsal</i> has <a href="http://michaelkimsal.com/blog/magento-book-review-found/">posted some clarifications</a>.
</p>
<blockquote>
Starting off with "However, I'm not really the type of person to give accolades unless something is absolutely stellar. As such, this post will primarily be about the shortcomings of the book" I wasn't particularly surprised that there was more of a focus on negatives rather than positives.
</blockquote>
<p>
<i>Michael</i> mentions three topics - the "first to market" point the reviewer makes about different versions of Magento between the book being authored and the release, some of the missing information the reviewer would've liked to see and the complexity of the example module that the reviewer complains is too hard to follow.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:36:44 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Debuggable Blog: Programming Psychology - Return home early]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10058</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/10058</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<i>Felix Geisendorfer</i> is taking an interesting approach to defining programming in <a href="http://www.debuggable.com/posts/return-home-early-a-programmers-mind:4811de9f-ae28-49c2-a7dc-2f154834cda3">this new post</a> to the Debuggable blog - he's coming at it more from the level of the perception the programmer has about writing good code.
</p>
<blockquote>
I believe understanding the patterns in your own thinking will by far make the biggest impact on how good you will get as a programmer. Forget design patterns, forget unit testing, forget all those functions you know. Important is to question why they exist and how they could be improved.
</blockquote>
<p>
He illustrates through <a href="http://www.debuggable.com/posts/return-home-early-a-programmers-mind:4811de9f-ae28-49c2-a7dc-2f154834cda3">a few examples</a> what he means. He describes one such thought method, the "return home early" process - basically, if something looks too complex for its own good, it probably is. He offers a different way of thinking about it too, a more visual way that can help simplify things even more by laying out the pieces and seeing where they all fit.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:36:43 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
