<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:52:53 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Marco Tabini's Blog: The origin of the &lt;blink> tag ]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/14619</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/14619</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
In a recent post to his blog <i>Marco Tabini</i> talks about <a href="http://blog.tabini.ca/2010/06/the-origin-of-the-blink-tag">the "monkey on the back" syndrome</a> that affects so much of the technology projects these days. His example for PHP? register_globals.
</p>
<blockquote>
One such example is the register_globals setting in PHP which finally managed to get deprecated in PHP 5.3 (and, the way things are going, may never disappear altogether) after much fighting and gnawing of teeth. [...] The existence of register_globals is problematic in many ways, but it is consistent: as long as you have a version of PHP that supports it installed, you will have the opportunity to use it1. When it is discarded, it ceases to exist, so that rewriting your code becomes a prerequisite to upgrading to a new version of PHP.
</blockquote>
<p>
He also relates it to a &lt;blink> tag - something that really shouldn't be used any more but, because someone decided it was a good idea in the past, several browsers have included support for it. The moral of the story? Well-planned standards are a good thing.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:33:21 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
