<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:50:07 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Jim Plush's Blog: I'm Officially a Baker with CakePHP]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5676</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5676</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Jim Plush</i> talks in <a href="http://www.litfuel.net/plush/?postid=138">his latest blog entry</a> about being a "baker" with CakePHP, detailing some of his first forays into the CakePHP framework.
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
I've always dreaded frameworks. Ususually it takes longer to learn a framework than to actually code the project in the first place. Over the years I've checked out various frameworks and all fell short when I tried to do something that needs to be done in the real world. There's always some tradeoff that needs to be made.
</p>
<p>
Now Zend Framework will no doubt be successfull and most likely in a year from now should have a pretty good feature set but for today it looks like there is a king of the hill for PHP frameworks(for me anyway). CakePHP.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
He <a href="http://www.litfuel.net/plush/?postid=138">talks about</a> some of the major advantages that he sees for the project, including its documentation, built-in pagination support, and Active Record functionality. There was an issue with the last of them that he noticed as his code got a bit more complex - performance issues with the Active Record implementation. Outside of that, though, he only found goodness inside of <a href="http://www.cakephp.org">this cake</a>.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:39:38 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
