<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>PHPDeveloper.org</title>
    <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org</link>
    <description>Up-to-the Minute PHP News, views and community</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:26:47 -0500</pubDate>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[iPerSec.com: Benchmarking PHP accelerators]]></title>
      <guid>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5491</guid>
      <link>http://www.phpdeveloper.org/news/5491</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>
<i>Jean-François Bustarret</i> talks about a topic in <a href="http://www.ipersec.com/index.php?q=en/bench_ea_vs_apc">his new post</a> the entire PHP community could definitely benefit from - PHP accelerators.
</p>
<p>
In the article, he looks at what accelerators are, how they work, and some of the ones that are currently out there in the market:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://pecl.php.net/package/APC">APC</a>
<li><a href="http://eaccelerator.net/">eAccelerator</a>
<li><a href="http://www.zend.com/products/zend_platform">Zend Platform</a>
</ul>
</p>
<p>
With the ground rules established, he breaks out the analysis into a few different rounds/categories including: support/maintenance, the accelerator's actual performance (including the code they used) and the results he discovered (all graphed out), and, finally, how they handle file updates made to the system.
</p>
<p>
In <a href="http://www.ipersec.com/index.php?q=en/bench_ea_vs_apc&page=0%2C3">the end</a>, there just isn't one that's a clear winner. What it really boils down to is what kind of situation you're in - Zend's option is good if you can pay for everything, otherwise, you'd do well to go with eAccelerator.
</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:43:14 -0500</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
